Jul 19, 2018  SmartGit is a Git GUI client with support for SVN, GitHub, BitBucket pull requests and comments. SmartGit targets professional users. SmartGit is a graphical Git client with support for SVN and Pull Requests for GitHub and Bitbucket. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux. No need to install and configure additional tools.

I am aware of this question, but it is a bit old now, and some of the answers seem outdated.

Question: please write one answer per GUI you have used, including pros and cons (for example, as far as I can tell, with git gui, you can't manage the stash).

closed as off-topic by user764357, greg-449, Vogel612, EdChum, CristikDec 7 '15 at 9:57

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• 'Questions asking us to recommend or find a book, tool, software library, tutorial or other off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.' – greg-449, Vogel612, EdChum, Cristik

8 Answers

(This is not exactly a 'Windows' standalone Git GUI, but still quite advanced)

Considering that since then, Eclipse is in the process of mirroring all its projects in Git repositories, EGit (based on JGit) have made some progress and are part of the Eclipse ecosystem, and is on par with its Mercurial counterpart.

You can contribute to EGit there.

This Tutorial is quite complete.

So far I've been happiest with Git Extensions.

Best Git Ui

Pros:

• Fairly complete access to git commands
• Doesn't hide git specifics like the index (unlike Tortoise)
• Good branch visualization
• Visual Studio integration in addition to standalone GUI or shell integration
• Actively developed

Cons:

• UI is rough around the edges in looks and usability.

Have a look at Atlassian SourceTree. It's a free Git Client for Windows & Mac.

I'm using it since the beta. And it's really the best tool ive ever used for git in my opinion.

Say goodbye to the command line – use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

More informations under:

I've been using SmartGit for a few days now, and I have to say I'm very impressed. I'm not a git-genius, but so far I haven't had to break out the CLI for anything.

And the UI is just... pleasant, frictionless. There aren't any of the 'couldn't they just have done this?' annoyances that I've found with others.

Another option now is http://windows.github.com/ Github for windows. But only really if you are syncing with GitHub. I've been using this for a few weeks, and I do find I need to fire up a shell from time to time. Its also unclear what commands its actually issuing. I keep ending up in the middle of a broken rebase - but I have no idea why its rebasing! But for frictionless use 99% of the time its great.

As for the GitHub for Windows - I have used it for a little time and it's pretty nice. Very esthetic and quite straight forward. It's even better when working with repositories located on GitHub (however I used it with other targets as well).

Today I switched to completely new client for Windows made by Bitbucket named SourceTree. As I understand it's a port from Mac client and thanks to that it looks and feels great. It has LOADS of options and tools (I have not familiarized myself with many of them) and it's constantly developed ( http://blog.bitbucket.org/2013/03/19/introducing-sourcetree-git-client-microsoft-windows/ ). They released the Beta version on 19.03.2013 and they have some really nice plans for future (Mercurial support as well!). I do think that it's worth a look.

I've used the following

GitHub for Windows - required me to download installer which took a long time for me to install. UI was too basic for me and at that time was very slow even when using a local repository.

SourceTree - UI looks goods but under delivers on features when compared to GitEye and SmartGit.

Collabnet GitEye (site) - UI is famililar to Eclipse users just like me. Worked great and especially had a credential store (SecureStore) which inspired some confidence in how it handles storing of passwords plus SSH key management.

SmartGit (site) - offers personal and commercial versions but even the personal version is an absolute pleasure to use. Staging files, looking at logs, reverting, committing, pushing etc. The features were sufficient for me.

I'd recommend the last two especially SmartGit since the UI is user friendly and pushing to more than 1 repository is much easier.

My answer is not really that verbose but please try to download and see for yourself.

With visual studio there is http://gitscc.codeplex.com/ Git Source Control Provider which is a Visual Studio Extension. More into in this SO question Using Git with Visual Studio

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged windowsgituser-interface or ask your own question.

GitHub is at heart a Git repository hosting service, i.e. a cloud-based source code management or version control system, but that’s just the beginning. In addition, GitHub implements features for code review (pull requests, diffs, and review requests), project management (including issue tracking and assignment), integrations with other developer tools, team management, documentation, and “social coding.”

Something like a social networking site for programmers, GitHub is an open environment where programmers can freely share and collaborate (even ad hoc) on open source code. GitHub makes it easy to find useful code, copy repositories for your own use, and submit changes to others’ projects. As a result, GitHub has become home to virtually every open source project of any importance.

Whenever I want to explore an open source project, I start by searching for the project name. Once I find the project website, I look for its code repository link, and nine times out of 10 I wind up on GitHub.

Git version control

Before we can understand what GitHub does and how GitHub works, we need to understand Git. Git is a distributed version control system, originally written by Linus Torvalds in 2005 for and with help from the Linux kernel community. I’m not here to sell you on Git, so I’ll spare you the spiel about how fast and small and flexible and popular it is, but you should know that when you clone a Git repository (“repo,” for short) you get the entire version history on your own computer, not just a snapshot from one branch at one time.

Git started as a command-line tool, befitting its origin in the Linux kernel community. You can still use the Git command line, if you like, but you don’t have to. Instead of or in addition to the command line, you can use the free GitHub client on Windows or Mac, or any of a number of other GUIs for Git, or a code editor that integrates with Git. All of these options are initially easier to use than the command line. The Git command line comes pre-installed on most Mac and Linux systems and supports all operations; the GUIs typically support a frequently used subset of Git operations.

Git Ui Tool For Bitbucket Machine

Git is different from older version control systems such as Subversion in that it is distributed rather than centralized. It’s also quite fast, especially since most operations happen on your local repository. Nevertheless, using Git adds a level of complexity: committing code to your local repository and pushing your commits to a remote repository are separate steps. When teams forget this (or weren’t taught about it) it can lead to situations where different developers are working with code bases that have diverged.

A remote Git repository can be on a server, or it can be on another developer’s machine. That enables many possible workflows for teams. One common workflow involves using a server repository as the “blessed” repository, to which only reviewed, well-tested code is committed, often through a pull request issued from a developer’s repository.

GitHub functionality

I’ve already noted that GitHub is a cloud-based Git server for code hosting and social coding, and that it implements features for code review (pull requests, diffs, and review requests), project management (including issue tracking and assignment), integrations with other developer tools, team management, and documentation.

The latest innovation in social coding from GitHub is commit co-authors, which you accomplish by adding one or more “co-authored-by” trailers to the end of a commit message. This mechanism doesn’t affect the repo core per se, and doesn’t change how the repo looks on plain Git, but on GitHub the chrome will show multiple committers in the commit list, and give each co-author credit in his or her contribution graph.

If you wish, you can extend GitHub using the GitHub GraphQL API. This is a significant improvement over GitHub’s previous API, which was based on REST calls.

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub.com is a cloud hosting service that can handle a range of account types: free (public repos only) and paid ($7 per month) developer accounts, teams ($9 per user per month), and businesses ($21 per user per month). Should you wish to run GitHub Enterprise on-premises or in your own cloud instance on AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, or IBM Cloud, you can do so for the same $21 per user per month price as a hosted business account. GitHub Enterprise adds a few useful features, such as in-app messaging to users and access provisioning integrated with LDAP directories, but gives up GitHub.com’s 99.95 percent uptime SLA for hosted business accounts.

GitHub vs. Bitbucket

GitHub isn’t the only hosted enhanced Git service, and GitHub Enterprise isn’t the only on-premises product for companies. Atlassian Bitbucket competes with both of them, with slightly lower pricing and with a free five-member team level that includes unlimited private repos and the use of Bitbucket Pipelines for continuous integration. GitHub is a more popular site for open source projects and it has a much larger pool of open source developers. Bitbucket’s pricing is more favorable for small startups.

GitHub vs. GitLab

GitLab competes with both GitHub and Bitbucket, both hosted and on-premises. On the surface, GitLab appears to have more lifecycle functionality than the others, but the difference from Atlassian mostly disappears if you include Jira when you evaluate Bitbucket. GitLab offers Gold-plan cloud features to open source projects for free, but that additional functionality doesn’t really compensate for the larger open-source developer community on GitHub.

GitHub Desktop

GitHub Desktop, shown below, makes it easy to manage your GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise repositories. While it doesn’t implement all the features of the Git command line and the GitHub web GUI, it does implement all the operations you’ll do on a daily basis from your desktop while contributing to projects. Typically, you will clone repos from GitHub to GitHub Desktop, sync them as needed, create branches for your work, commit your work, and occasionally revert one or more commits.

To work with repos for which you lack commit and collaborate privileges, you typically start by forking the repo on GitHub and cloning the fork to your desktop. Then you add any branches you need in GitHub Desktop, commit any changes you wish, test your work, push the commits back to your remote forked repo, and finally generate a pull request to the parent project.

You can see the Pull Request button at the upper right of the GitHub Desktop interface. You can also see many commits in the Neo4j project that were merges of branches or pull requests. That’s typical of open source projects with few committers and many contributors.

Atom editor

You can use any programming editor you like to edit code, including GitHub’s free, open source, hackable Atom editor (shown below), which integrates well with GitHub and GitHub Desktop. You can use Atom on MacOS, Windows, or Linux. You can open Atom from GitHub Desktop by right-clicking on the repository you wish to browse or edit.

Atom ships with about 90 packages, four UI themes, and eight syntax themes. You can add any of 7,000 packages and 2,000 themes to your installation of Atom. Packages can support specific programming languages, such as TypeScript, or add functionality, such as Hydrogen, an interactive coding environment that supports Python, R, JavaScript and other Jupyter kernels.

Atom is built with HTML, JavaScript, CSS, and Node.js integration. It runs on Electron, a framework for building cross platform apps using web technologies. GitHub Desktop also runs on Electron.

GitHub projects

Open source software projects often need ways to enforce quality control while still accepting contributions from outside the core team of committers. The need for contributors is huge, but bringing new contributors into the project while maintaining the integrity of the codebase is a difficult and potentially dangerous undertaking. At the same time, the need for feedback from users of the project is also huge.

GitHub has a number of mechanisms that can help grease the wheels of open source projects. For example, users can add issues to the project on GitHub to report bugs or request features. Some other systems call these tickets. Project managers working with issues can generate task lists, assign issues to specific contributors, mention other interested contributors so that they are notified of changes, add labels, and add milestones.

To contribute to a project, you basically start from a topic head branch that contains the committed changes that you want added to the project base branch and initialize a pull request from the head branch, as shown below. Then you push your commits and add them to the project branch. Other contributors can review your proposed changes, add review comments, contribute to the pull request discussion, and add their own commits to the pull request.

Once everyone involved is happy with the proposed changes, a committer can merge the pull request. The merge can preserve all the commits, squash all changes into a single commit, or rebase the commits from the head branch into the base branch. If the merge generates conflicts, you can resolve them on GitHub or using the command line.

Linux Git Ui

Code reviews on GitHub allow a distributed team to collaborate asynchronously. Useful GitHub tools for reviewers include diffs (the lower half of the screenshot below), history (the upper half), and blame view (a way to view the evolution of a file commit by commit). Code discussions on GitHub go into comments that are presented inline with your code changes. If the built-in tools don’t suffice for your project, you can add code review and continuous integration tools from the GitHub marketplace. Marketplace add-ons are often free for open source projects.

GitHub gists

Gists are special GitHub repositories for sharing your work (public) or for saving work for later reuse (secret). They can contain single files, parts of files, or full applications. You can download gists, clone them, fork them, and embed them.

Public gists can be discovered and found in searches. You can use keywords to narrow down what you find, including prefixes to restrict the results to gists from specific users, gists with at least N stars, gists with specific filenames, and so on.

Secret gists are not searchable, but anyone with the URL can see them. If you really want your code to be protected, use a private repository.

As we’ve seen, GitHub provides Git repositories as a service, along with features for code review, project management, integrations with other developer tools, team management, social coding, and documentation. While GitHub is not the only product in its category, it is the dominant repository for open source software development.